Joined
·
10,243 Posts
The NFL has forced a Indy church to cancel it's Super Bowl party. Evidently, the church violated the NFL's rules against showing it's games by;
A. Charging a fee (to cover snacks and soft drinks)
B. Using a TV larger than 55".
C. Using the words "Super Bowl" to advertise the event without permission.
I wonder;
A. If I can get into a sports bar in Indy or Chicago to watch the game and pay no cover charge.
B. If any of those bars have a TV larger than 55".
C. If the bars are using those words without permission.
Don't get me wrong. I am certainly not against bars doing any of these things. I just wonder why a church can't provide a somewhat different atmosphere for it's members and their guests to watch the game. It doesn't even appear to be a fund-raiser. Strikes me as a bad public image move for the NFL. Are there any teeth in the NFL's rules? Or......... would they prosecute a violation as vigorously as they do their substance abuse rule?
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070201/SPORTS03/70201036
A. Charging a fee (to cover snacks and soft drinks)
B. Using a TV larger than 55".
C. Using the words "Super Bowl" to advertise the event without permission.
I wonder;
A. If I can get into a sports bar in Indy or Chicago to watch the game and pay no cover charge.
B. If any of those bars have a TV larger than 55".
C. If the bars are using those words without permission.
Don't get me wrong. I am certainly not against bars doing any of these things. I just wonder why a church can't provide a somewhat different atmosphere for it's members and their guests to watch the game. It doesn't even appear to be a fund-raiser. Strikes me as a bad public image move for the NFL. Are there any teeth in the NFL's rules? Or......... would they prosecute a violation as vigorously as they do their substance abuse rule?
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070201/SPORTS03/70201036